
Packet Forwarder vs. Built-in LNS: Choosing the Right LoRaWAN Gateway Mode
|
|
Time to read 6 min
|
|
Time to read 6 min
So, you've selected a LoRaWAN gateway for your IoT project. Now you're faced with a critical configuration choice that will define your entire network architecture: should you run it in Packet Forwarder mode or as a gateway with a Built-in LoRaWAN Network Server (LNS)?
This guide dives deep into these two primary LoRaWAN Gateway Modes.
We'll break down how each mode works, provide a head-to-head comparison of their pros and cons, and offer clear advice on which to choose for your specific application—whether you're connecting to a public network or building a secure, private IoT solution.
You've unboxed your new LoRaWAN gateway, powered it on, and it's ready to connect. But connect to what, and how? This is a fundamental question that I've seen trip up many developers. The way your gateway handles data packets determines your network's latency, reliability, security, and cost. It's a strategic decision that goes far beyond a simple configuration toggle.
At its core, every LoRaWAN packet needs to get from your sensor, through the gateway, to a LoRaWAN Network Server (LNS), which is the brain of the network. The choice of LoRaWAN gateway mode dictates where that brain lives. Does it live in the cloud, or can it live directly inside your gateway? This distinction is a core concept for any Industrial IoT Edge Gateway , and understanding the trade-offs is key to building a successful LoRaWAN solution.
Simple Gateway Configuration: Setting up the gateway itself is incredibly easy. You typically only need to point it to the IP address of your Network Server.
Centralized Management: If you have dozens of gateways spread across a large area, having them all point to a single, centralized LNS in the cloud can simplify management.
Easy to Connect to Public Networks: This is the required mode for connecting your gateway to public or community-run LoRaWAN networks.
Requires Constant Internet Connection: Let's be clear: if the gateway's internet backhaul fails, it becomes a paperweight. It cannot receive or buffer messages, and your entire network segment goes down.
Higher Latency: The round-trip time for a packet to travel from the gateway to the cloud LNS and for a command to travel back can introduce significant latency, making it unsuitable for real-time control applications.
Data Sovereignty & Security Concerns: Your raw data passes through the public internet and (in the case of public networks) third-party servers, which may not be acceptable for sensitive industrial or corporate data.
Higher Data Costs: All LoRaWAN traffic, including metadata and keep-alives, is sent over your internet backhaul, which can increase cellular data costs.
Full Data Sovereignty and Security: Your data can be processed entirely on your local network without ever touching the public internet, providing maximum security.
Ultra-Low Latency: Since the Network Server is on the same device as the radio, downlink commands and acknowledgments are nearly instantaneous.
Offline Operation: This is the killer feature. If the gateway's internet backhaul fails, the LoRaWAN network continues to function perfectly. The gateway can keep receiving data, controlling local devices, and buffering data until the internet connection is restored.
Reduced Data Costs: Only clean, decrypted application data is sent over the internet backhaul, significantly reducing cellular data usage.
Requires a More Powerful Gateway: You need a gateway with sufficient CPU, RAM, and storage to run the LNS software, such as ChirpStack, in addition to its packet forwarding duties.
More Initial Setup: The initial configuration of the LNS on the gateway is more involved than simply pointing a packet forwarder at an IP address.
Decentralized Management: If you have many gateways, each running its own LNS, you need a strategy to manage them (though this can be done via a cloud platform like RCMS).
Feature |
Packet Forwarder Mode |
Built-in LNS Mode |
Setup Complexity |
Very Simple |
More Involved |
Data Path |
Gateway -> Internet -> Cloud LNS |
Gateway -> (Optional) Internet |
Latency |
High (100s of ms to seconds) |
Very Low (milliseconds) |
Offline Capability |
None |
Full Local Operation |
Data Sovereignty |
Lower (data crosses internet/3rd parties) |
Complete |
Best For |
Public Networks, Non-Critical Apps |
Private Networks, Industrial Control |
So, how do you decide? It comes down to your application's requirements.
Choose Packet Forwarder Mode if:
You are connecting to a public or existing third-party LoRaWAN network.
You have many gateways and want to manage a single LNS instance in the cloud.
Your application is not time-sensitive and can tolerate internet latency.
Choose Built-in LNS Mode if:
You are building a Private LoRaWAN Network for a specific site (like a farm, factory, or building).
You require high reliability and offline operation .
Your application requires ultra-low latency for control or command responses.
Data sovereignty and security are your top priorities.
Choosing a versatile gateway is key. An industrial gateway like the Robustel R1520LG is powerful enough to run a full ChirpStack LNS locally, making it a perfect all-in-one solution for a private network. At the same time, it can be easily configured to operate as a simple, reliable packet forwarder for connecting to any external network server. This flexibility allows you to adapt your strategy as your needs evolve.
The choice between LoRaWAN gateway modes is a foundational decision in your IoT network design. While Packet Forwarder mode offers simplicity and easy access to public networks, the Built-in LNS mode provides the security, reliability, and performance demanded by serious industrial and commercial applications. By understanding the trade-offs and selecting a flexible, industrial-grade gateway, you can build a LoRaWAN solution that is perfectly tailored to your project's unique requirements.
A1: Yes, on a flexible gateway like the R1520LG. You can start by forwarding packets to a cloud server and later decide to install and run the ChirpStack LNS directly on the gateway for a fully private network, or vice versa.
A2: No, it actually saves data. When the LNS is running locally, only the small, processed application data is sent over the cellular backhaul, not the much larger raw LoRaWAN packets with their metada
A3: ChirpStack is the leading open-source LoRaWAN Network Server. Because it's open-source and efficient, it can be installed directly onto a powerful gateway (using Docker), making it the most popular choice for creating a private, all-in-one LoRaWAN gateway with a built-in LNS.