A visual comparison showing a rusty temporary magnetic antenna versus a durable professional fiberglass antenna for LoRaWAN gateways.

Antenna Selection 101: Fiberglass vs. Magnetic Antennas for LoRaWAN Gateways

Written by: Robert Liao

|

Published on

|

Time to read 5 min

Author: Robert Liao, Technical Support Engineer

Robert Liao is an IoT Technical Support Engineer at Robustel with hands-on experience in industrial networking and edge connectivity. Certified as a Networking Engineer, he specializes in helping customers deploy, configure, and troubleshoot IIoT solutions in real-world environments. In addition to delivering expert training and support, Robert provides tailored solutions based on customer needs—ensuring reliable, scalable, and efficient system performance across a wide range of industrial applications.

Summary

The antenna is the "mouth" and "ears" of your LoRaWAN gateway. Choosing the wrong one can cripple even the most expensive hardware. This guide compares the two most common antenna types: the rugged Fiberglass (Collinear) antenna and the cheap Magnetic Mount (Whip) antenna. We dive deep into the physics of "Cable Loss"—explaining why the thin cable on a magnetic antenna destroys your signal—and the "Ground Plane" requirement that most installers miss. By understanding these differences, you can choose the right aerial to maximize your network's range and reliability.

Key Takeaways

The Cable Killer: Magnetic antennas often come with thin RG174 cable that loses 1dB per meter. A 3m cable can eat 50% of your signal before it reaches the LoRaWAN gateway.

Ground Plane Dependence: Magnetic antennas need a metal surface (like a car roof) to work. Fiberglass antennas are "Ground Plane Independent" and work anywhere.

Durability: Fiberglass is built for permanent outdoor use (10+ years). Magnetic mounts are for temporary testing; water eventually wicks down the cable into the gateway.

Gain Reality: High gain (8dBi) isn't always better. On a LoRaWAN gateway, a moderate 5dBi fiberglass antenna usually offers the best balance of range and coverage.

Antenna Selection 101: Fiberglass vs. Magnetic Antennas for LoRaWAN Gateways

A visual comparison showing a rusty temporary magnetic antenna versus a durable professional fiberglass antenna for LoRaWAN gateways.You have bought an industrial LoRaWAN gateway. It probably came with a small black "stick" antenna in the box. Now you are looking online, and you see huge white fiberglass tubes and small magnetic bases.

Which one should you use?

The antenna is the single most critical component for range. A $500 LoRaWAN gateway with a bad antenna performs worse than a $100 gateway with a great antenna.

The market is split between two main types: Fiberglass and Magnetic Mount. This guide breaks down the physics, the flaws, and the use cases for each to help you build a better network.

1. The Magnetic Mount Antenna (The "Mag Mount")

These are small, metal whips with a magnetic base and a permanently attached cable. They are cheap ($10-$20) and ubiquitous.

The Hidden Flaw: Cable Loss

The biggest problem with mag mount antennas is the cable. They almost always use RG174, a very thin coaxial cable.

  • The Math: At 915 MHz, RG174 loses approximately 1 dB per meter.
  • The Result: If your mag mount has a 3-meter cable, you lose 3 dB. Since 3 dB represents a doubling/halving of power, you have lost 50% of your signal before it even touches the LoRaWAN gateway.
  • The Verdict: The antenna might have "3 dBi Gain," but the cable has "3 dB Loss." The net result is 0 dB. You gained nothing.

The "Ground Plane" Trap

Magnetic antennas are "monopoles" (half an antenna). They rely on a "Ground Plane"—a flat metal surface—to act as the other half (the mirror image).

  • Correct Usage: Stuck to the roof of a car or a metal cabinet.
  • Incorrect Usage: Stuck to a wooden fence, a plastic box, or a window sill. Without a metal surface under it, a magnetic antenna connected to a LoRaWAN gateway will have a terrible VSWR (Voltage Standing Wave Ratio), reflecting energy back into the radio and killing your range.

Best For: Temporary site surveys, drive-testing coverage, or vehicle tracking.

2. The Fiberglass Antenna (The "Collinear")

These are rigid tubes, usually white or grey, ranging from 30cm to 1 meter long. They are the standard for professional deployments.

Why They Win: Ground Plane Independent

Fiberglass antennas are typically "Collinear Arrays"—a stack of dipoles inside the tube.

  • The Advantage: They are Ground Plane Independent. You can mount them on a fiberglass pole, a wooden post, or the side of a brick building. They do not need a metal sheet to work. This gives you total flexibility in placing your LoRaWAN gateway.

Superior Cabling

Fiberglass antennas have an N-Type connector on the bottom. You choose the cable.

  • The Upgrade: Instead of lossy RG174, you can use LMR400 cable.
  • The Math: LMR400 loses only 0.13 dB per meter.
  • The Result: You can run a cable 10 meters up a tower and only lose ~1.3 dB. Your LoRaWAN gateway hears clearer, stronger signals from much further away.

Best For: Permanent outdoor base stations, high-tower installations, and agriculture.


A diagram comparing the poor radiation pattern of a magnetic antenna without a ground plane versus the optimal doughnut pattern of a fiberglass antenna.


3. Gain: Does Size Matter?

Fiberglass antennas come in 3dBi, 5.8dBi, and 8dBi versions. Higher numbers mean the signal is "flatter."

  • Low Gain (3 dBi): Shaped like a beach ball. Good for hilly terrain or urban areas where the LoRaWAN gateway needs to hear sensors above or below it.
  • High Gain (8 dBi): Shaped like a pancake. It reaches very far horizontally but has a "blind spot" directly underneath the tower.
  • The Sweet Spot: For most industrial LoRaWAN gateway deployments, 5.8 dBi is the perfect balance. It punches through trees but still covers the immediate area.

4. Durability and Weatherproofing

A LoRaWAN gateway deployed for a Smart City project must last 10 years.

  • Mag Mount: The cable entry point is a weak spot. Water eventually wicks down the braid of the coax and floods the gateway antenna port. The steel whip rusts.
  • Fiberglass: Rated IP67. The fiberglass radome is UV stabilized (it won't crack in the sun). The N-Type connector is weather-sealed. It is designed to survive hurricanes and ice storms.

A cross-section graphic comparing thin RG174 coaxial cable with high signal loss against thick LMR400 cable with low signal loss.


Conclusion: Stop Strangling Your Signal

If you are building a proof-of-concept on your desk, a magnetic antenna is fine. But for a production network, it is a liability.

The combination of high cable loss and ground plane dependence makes magnetic antennas unsuitable for critical infrastructure. By investing in a high-quality fiberglass antenna and low-loss LMR400 cable, you remove the chokehold on your LoRaWAN gateway. You allow the high-sensitivity radio chip to do its job, ensuring your sensors stay connected even at the edge of the range.

Frequently Asked Questions :About LoRaWAN Gateway

Q1: Can I cut the cable on a magnetic antenna to reduce loss?

A1: Technically yes, but it is difficult. The cable is often tuned to the antenna's impedance. Shortening it requires crimping a new SMA connector onto a very thin wire, which requires specialized tools. It is usually more cost-effective to simply buy a better antenna for your LoRaWAN gateway than to try modifying a cheap consumer product.

Q2: Do I need a lightning arrestor for a fiberglass antenna?

A2: Yes. Fiberglass antennas are often mounted high up, making them lightning targets. You must install a Gas Discharge Tube (GDT) Surge Arrestor between the antenna and the LoRaWAN gateway. This device diverts the high-voltage spike from a nearby strike to the ground wire, saving your expensive gateway from being fried.

Q3: My fiberglass antenna rattles. Is it broken?

A3: Not necessarily. Inside the tube, the actual antenna element (a brass or copper wire structure) is often free-floating or held by foam spacers. If you shake it, you might hear movement. However, if it sounds like loose broken bits (like maracas), the internal solder joints may have failed during shipping. Test the VSWR with an analyzer before connecting it to your LoRaWAN gateway.