LoRaWAN Gateway Chips: Sx1301 vs Sx1302/Sx1303
|
|
Time to read 5 min
|
|
Time to read 5 min
When you look at the datasheet of a LoRaWAN gateway, you will see a reference to the "Baseband Processor"—usually Semtech Sx1301, Sx1302, or Sx1303. To the uninitiated, these look like random model numbers. To an engineer, they define the performance, heat profile, and future-proofing of the device. This guide compares the legacy Sx1301 (Generation 1) with the modern Sx1302/Sx1303 (Generation 2). We explain why the Sx1302 revolutionized LoRaWAN gateway design by drastically reducing power consumption and why the Sx1303 is essential for geolocation.
The Heat Problem: The legacy Sx1301 runs hot and consumes high power, complicating the thermal design of an outdoor LoRaWAN gateway.
The Sx1302 Revolution: The newer Sx1302 chip runs cooler, costs less, and supports more Spreading Factors (SF5-SF12), making it the standard for modern gateways.
Geolocation (Sx1303): The Sx1303 is identical to the Sx1302 but adds "Fine Timestamping," enabling Time Difference of Arrival (TDOA) geolocation without GPS on the sensor.
Future Proofing: Always choose a LoRaWAN gateway based on Gen 2 silicon (Sx1302/03) for better longevity and lower operational costs.
The engine of a car determines its speed and fuel economy. Similarly, the "Baseband Chip" (or Concentrator) determines the capacity and efficiency of a LoRaWAN gateway.
For years, the industry relied on the Semtech Sx1301. It was the pioneer. But like all first-generation technology, it had flaws—specifically, it was power-hungry and expensive.
Today, if you are buying a LoRaWAN gateway, you will likely face a choice between the older Sx1301 and the newer Sx1302 or Sx1303.
Does it matter? Yes.
The chip inside dictates how hot the gateway gets, how many messages it can process, and whether it can track location. This guide breaks down the silicon wars to help you choose the right LoRaWAN gateway.

Released in 2013, the Sx1301 was the first chip to enable the "Star-of-Stars" topology. It allowed a LoRaWAN gateway to listen to 8 channels simultaneously.
However, it was designed on an older manufacturing process.
While the Sx1301 is a reliable workhorse, buying a new Sx1301 LoRaWAN gateway today is like buying a laptop from 2015.
Released in 2019, the Sx1302 changed the game. It was a complete redesign aimed at lowering the cost and complexity of building a LoRaWAN gateway.
The Sx1302 consumes significantly less power than the Sx1301.
The Sx1302 added support for lower Spreading Factors (SF5 and SF6).
The Sx1302 integrated many external components (like the Front End) into the chip itself.

The Sx1303 is physically almost identical to the Sx1302. It has the same low power and high capacity.
But it has one "superpower": Fine Timestamping.
In standard LoRaWAN, you know which gateway heard a sensor.
With Sx1303, the LoRaWAN gateway records the arrival of the signal with nanosecond precision.
If your application requires tracking assets without killing their batteries with GPS, you must specify an Sx1303 LoRaWAN gateway.

Feature |
Sx1301 (Legacy) |
Sx1302 (Standard) |
Sx1303 (Advanced) |
Year |
2013 |
2019 |
2020 |
Power Draw |
High |
Low |
Low |
Heat |
High (Needs Heatsink) |
Low (Runs Cool) |
Low (Runs Cool) |
Spreading Factors |
SF7-SF12 |
SF5-SF12 |
SF5-SF12 |
Geolocation |
RSSI Only (Weak) |
RSSI Only (Weak) |
TDOA (Strong) |
Cost |
High |
Low |
Medium |
The evolution of silicon has made the LoRaWAN gateway more powerful, efficient, and affordable.
There is rarely a reason to buy an Sx1301 device today unless you are maintaining legacy infrastructure. For all new deployments, an Sx1302 LoRaWAN gateway(like the Robustel R1520LG) offers the best balance of thermal performance and cost. If you need tracker-free geolocation, upgrade to the Sx1303.
By paying attention to the chip inside the box, you ensure your network is built on modern, efficient foundations.
A1: Yes. The baseband chip change is strictly on the gateway side. The communication protocol (LoRaWAN) remains exactly the same. An Sx1302 LoRaWAN gateway is fully backward compatible with any LoRaWAN v1.0, v1.0.2, or v1.1 sensor deployed in the last 10 years.
A2: No. TDOA geolocation using an Sx1303 LoRaWAN gateway typically offers accuracy between 20 to 100 meters. GPS offers 1-5 meters. Sx1303 is perfect for knowing "which building" an asset is in, but not "which desk." However, it consumes zero extra battery on the sensor, whereas GPS drains batteries fast.
A3: No. The Sx1276 (and Sx1262) are node chips meant for sensors. They are single-channel radios. Some cheap "Single Channel Gateways" use these chips. Do not buy them. A real LoRaWAN gateway must use an Sx130x concentrator (8-channel) to comply with the LoRaWAN standard.