A timeline graphic showing the evolution of Semtech LoRaWAN gateway chips from the hot Sx1301 to the efficient Sx1302 and geolocation-capable Sx1303.

LoRaWAN Gateway Chips: Sx1301 vs Sx1302/Sx1303

Written by: Robert Liao

|

Published on

|

Time to read 5 min

Author: Robert Liao, Technical Support Engineer

Robert Liao is an IoT Technical Support Engineer at Robustel with hands-on experience in industrial networking and edge connectivity. Certified as a Networking Engineer, he specializes in helping customers deploy, configure, and troubleshoot IIoT solutions in real-world environments. In addition to delivering expert training and support, Robert provides tailored solutions based on customer needs—ensuring reliable, scalable, and efficient system performance across a wide range of industrial applications.

Summary

When you look at the datasheet of a LoRaWAN gateway, you will see a reference to the "Baseband Processor"—usually Semtech Sx1301, Sx1302, or Sx1303. To the uninitiated, these look like random model numbers. To an engineer, they define the performance, heat profile, and future-proofing of the device. This guide compares the legacy Sx1301 (Generation 1) with the modern Sx1302/Sx1303 (Generation 2). We explain why the Sx1302 revolutionized LoRaWAN gateway design by drastically reducing power consumption and why the Sx1303 is essential for geolocation.

Key Takeaways

The Heat Problem: The legacy Sx1301 runs hot and consumes high power, complicating the thermal design of an outdoor LoRaWAN gateway.

The Sx1302 Revolution: The newer Sx1302 chip runs cooler, costs less, and supports more Spreading Factors (SF5-SF12), making it the standard for modern gateways.

Geolocation (Sx1303): The Sx1303 is identical to the Sx1302 but adds "Fine Timestamping," enabling Time Difference of Arrival (TDOA) geolocation without GPS on the sensor.

Future Proofing: Always choose a LoRaWAN gateway based on Gen 2 silicon (Sx1302/03) for better longevity and lower operational costs.

LoRaWAN Gateway Chips: Sx1301 vs Sx1302/Sx1303

The engine of a car determines its speed and fuel economy. Similarly, the "Baseband Chip" (or Concentrator) determines the capacity and efficiency of a LoRaWAN gateway.

For years, the industry relied on the Semtech Sx1301. It was the pioneer. But like all first-generation technology, it had flaws—specifically, it was power-hungry and expensive.

Today, if you are buying a LoRaWAN gateway, you will likely face a choice between the older Sx1301 and the newer Sx1302 or Sx1303.

Does it matter? Yes.

The chip inside dictates how hot the gateway gets, how many messages it can process, and whether it can track location. This guide breaks down the silicon wars to help you choose the right LoRaWAN gateway.


A timeline graphic showing the evolution of Semtech LoRaWAN gateway chips from the hot Sx1301 to the efficient Sx1302 and geolocation-capable Sx1303.


The Legacy: Semtech Sx1301

Released in 2013, the Sx1301 was the first chip to enable the "Star-of-Stars" topology. It allowed a LoRaWAN gateway to listen to 8 channels simultaneously.

However, it was designed on an older manufacturing process.

  • High Power: An Sx1301 LoRaWAN gateway consumes significant power, which is a problem for solar-powered sites.
  • High Heat: It runs hot. Engineers had to build massive aluminum heatsinks and metal cases just to keep the chip from frying. This made legacy gateways heavy and expensive.
  • Limited Spreading Factors: It was optimized for SF7 to SF12. It struggled with the faster SF5 and SF6 speeds used in high-density networks.

While the Sx1301 is a reliable workhorse, buying a new Sx1301 LoRaWAN gateway today is like buying a laptop from 2015.

The Modern Standard: Semtech Sx1302

Released in 2019, the Sx1302 changed the game. It was a complete redesign aimed at lowering the cost and complexity of building a LoRaWAN gateway.

1. Thermal Efficiency

The Sx1302 consumes significantly less power than the Sx1301.

  • The Benefit: A LoRaWAN gateway using the Sx1302 runs much cooler. This allows manufacturers to build smaller enclosures or deploy in hotter climates (up to 75°C) without risking thermal shutdown.

2. Enhanced Capacity (SF5/SF6)

The Sx1302 added support for lower Spreading Factors (SF5 and SF6).

  • The Benefit: These faster data rates take up less "airtime." By supporting them, an Sx1302 LoRaWAN gateway can handle more sensors per second than its predecessor, making it ideal for dense smart city deployments.

3. Simplified Architecture

The Sx1302 integrated many external components (like the Front End) into the chip itself.

  • The Benefit: This lowers the manufacturing cost. That is why a modern industrial LoRaWAN gateway is often 30-40% cheaper than the gateways of five years ago.

A thermal imaging comparison demonstrating the significant heat reduction in an Sx1302 LoRaWAN gateway compared to a legacy Sx1301 model.


The Specialist: Semtech Sx1303 (Geolocation)

The Sx1303 is physically almost identical to the Sx1302. It has the same low power and high capacity.

But it has one "superpower": Fine Timestamping.

In standard LoRaWAN, you know which gateway heard a sensor.

With Sx1303, the LoRaWAN gateway records the arrival of the signal with nanosecond precision.

  • TDOA (Time Difference of Arrival): If three Sx1303 gateways hear the same sensor, the cloud can compare the timestamps. "Gateway A heard it 5 nanoseconds before Gateway B."
  • The Result: The network can triangulate the sensor's location (Geolocation) without the sensor having a GPS chip.

If your application requires tracking assets without killing their batteries with GPS, you must specify an Sx1303 LoRaWAN gateway.


A diagram illustrating Time Difference of Arrival (TDOA) technology, where three Sx1303 LoRaWAN gateways use nanosecond-level fine timestamping to triangulate a sensor's location without GPS.


Comparison Table: Which is in Your LoRaWAN Gateway?

Feature

Sx1301 (Legacy)

Sx1302 (Standard)

Sx1303 (Advanced)

Year

2013

2019

2020

Power Draw

High

Low

Low

Heat

High (Needs Heatsink)

Low (Runs Cool)

Low (Runs Cool)

Spreading Factors

SF7-SF12

SF5-SF12

SF5-SF12

Geolocation

RSSI Only (Weak)

RSSI Only (Weak)

TDOA (Strong)

Cost

High

Low

Medium

Conclusion: Choose Gen 2 for Longevity

The evolution of silicon has made the LoRaWAN gateway more powerful, efficient, and affordable.

There is rarely a reason to buy an Sx1301 device today unless you are maintaining legacy infrastructure. For all new deployments, an Sx1302 LoRaWAN gateway(like the Robustel R1520LG) offers the best balance of thermal performance and cost. If you need tracker-free geolocation, upgrade to the Sx1303.

By paying attention to the chip inside the box, you ensure your network is built on modern, efficient foundations.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q1: Can an Sx1302 LoRaWAN gateway talk to older sensors?

A1: Yes. The baseband chip change is strictly on the gateway side. The communication protocol (LoRaWAN) remains exactly the same. An Sx1302 LoRaWAN gateway is fully backward compatible with any LoRaWAN v1.0, v1.0.2, or v1.1 sensor deployed in the last 10 years.

Q2: Does the Sx1303 provide GPS-level accuracy?

A2: No. TDOA geolocation using an Sx1303 LoRaWAN gateway typically offers accuracy between 20 to 100 meters. GPS offers 1-5 meters. Sx1303 is perfect for knowing "which building" an asset is in, but not "which desk." However, it consumes zero extra battery on the sensor, whereas GPS drains batteries fast.

Q3: Is the Sx1276 a gateway chip?

A3: No. The Sx1276 (and Sx1262) are node chips meant for sensors. They are single-channel radios. Some cheap "Single Channel Gateways" use these chips. Do not buy them. A real LoRaWAN gateway must use an Sx130x concentrator (8-channel) to comply with the LoRaWAN standard.