NSA vs. SA: Choosing the Right 5G Gateway Architecture
|
|
Time to read 5 min
|
|
Time to read 5 min
When you look at the datasheet of a modern 5G Gateway, you will see a line that says: "Supports 5G NR NSA and SA." What does this mean? 5G is currently being rolled out in two phases: Non-Standalone (NSA), which relies on existing 4G infrastructure for speed, and Standalone (SA), which is "Pure 5G" built for low latency and smart features. This guide explains the technical differences, uses a simple car analogy to clarify the concepts, and explains why buying a gateway that supports both is critical for future-proofing your investment.
The Hybrid (NSA): NSA uses a 5G Radio for speed but relies on a 4G Core for control.1 It is fast but lacks ultra-low latency. It is the most common 5G today.
The Purebred (SA): SA uses a 5G Radio and a 5G Core.2 It unlocks the "Real" 5G features like Network Slicing and sub-10ms latency (URLLC).
The Risk: Early 5G devices (from 2019) often only support NSA. If you buy one today, it will stop working properly when carriers eventually switch to pure SA networks.
The Choice: Always choose a "Dual-Mode" 5G Gateway. It connects to NSA networks now and seamlessly switches to SA networks when they become available.
Not all "5G" is created equal.
You might have a 5G signal on your phone, but notice that the latency (ping) is still around 30ms—similar to 4G. Why?
The answer lies in the network architecture.
Carriers are rolling out 5G in two distinct stages: NSA (Non-Standalone) and SA (Standalone).3
For enterprise buyers, understanding this distinction is vital. If you buy the wrong hardware, your expensive 5G Gateway might become a paperweight in three years.

NSA stands for Non-Standalone.4
It is the "Fast Track" to 5G deployment. Most global 5G networks launched between 2019 and 2024 are NSA.
How it works:
Pros:
Cons:
SA stands for Standalone.
This is the "End Goal" of 5G. It is currently being rolled out by forward-thinking carriers (like T-Mobile in the US, or carriers in China/Singapore).5
How it works:
Pros:
Cons:

Think of 5G deployment like building a high-performance car.
In 2019, the first wave of 5G routers hit the market. Many were NSA Only.
If you deploy an NSA-only device today, you face a risk:
As carriers migrate spectrum from 4G to 5G SA, the "4G Anchor" signal might disappear or weaken. Your device will lose connectivity.
The Golden Rule:
When buying an Industrial 5G Gateway, check the spec sheet for "NSA/SA Dual Mode."
This ensures your device is a chameleon:

Feature |
NSA (Non-Standalone) |
SA (Standalone) |
Primary Focus |
Speed (eMBB) |
Latency (URLLC) & IoT |
Core Network |
4G (EPC) |
5G (5GC) |
Dependency |
Needs 4G Signal (Anchor) |
Independent |
Latency |
Medium (30-50ms) |
Low (<10ms) |
Network Slicing |
No |
Yes |
Best Use Case |
Web Browsing, Video Streaming |
Robotics, AGVs, Smart Grid |
The debate isn't really "NSA vs. SA"—it is "Now vs. Future."
NSA is the reality of today's coverage. SA is the requirement for tomorrow's applications.
By selecting a robust 5G Gateway that supports both architectures, you bridge the gap. You get the bandwidth you need immediately, with the assurance that your infrastructure is ready for the real-time revolution of the Standalone era.
A1: Most industrial 5G gateways have a "Status" page in their web interface. Look for "Network Type" or "5G State." It will explicitly say "5G NSA" (often showing an LTE band + 5G band, e.g., B2 + n71) or "5G SA" (showing only a 5G band, e.g., n71).
A2: Surprisingly, not always. Because NSA combines 4G and 5G bandwidth (Dual Connectivity), it can sometimes offer higher peak download speeds today. However, SA offers much faster upload speeds and significantly better latency.
A3: No. A 4G device cannot talk to a 5G Core. It will stay on the 4G LTE network. As long as the carrier maintains the 4G network (which they will for years), the device will work, but it will never get 5G benefits.