A conceptual illustration showing how Standalone (SA) architecture unlocks advanced 5G capabilities like network slicing and ultra-low latency.

NSA vs. SA: Choosing the Right 5G Gateway Architecture

Written by: Mark

|

Published on

|

Time to read 5 min

Author: Mark, Technical Support Engineer

Mark is an IoT Technical Support Engineer at Robustel with hands-on experience in industrial networking and edge connectivity. Certified as a Networking Engineer, he specializes in helping customers deploy, configure, and troubleshoot IIoT solutions in real-world environments. In addition to delivering expert training and support, Robert provides tailored solutions based on customer needs—ensuring reliable, scalable, and efficient system performance across a wide range of industrial applications.

Summary

When you look at the datasheet of a modern 5G Gateway, you will see a line that says: "Supports 5G NR NSA and SA." What does this mean? 5G is currently being rolled out in two phases: Non-Standalone (NSA), which relies on existing 4G infrastructure for speed, and Standalone (SA), which is "Pure 5G" built for low latency and smart features. This guide explains the technical differences, uses a simple car analogy to clarify the concepts, and explains why buying a gateway that supports both is critical for future-proofing your investment.

Key Takeaways

The Hybrid (NSA): NSA uses a 5G Radio for speed but relies on a 4G Core for control.1 It is fast but lacks ultra-low latency. It is the most common 5G today.

The Purebred (SA): SA uses a 5G Radio and a 5G Core.2 It unlocks the "Real" 5G features like Network Slicing and sub-10ms latency (URLLC).

The Risk: Early 5G devices (from 2019) often only support NSA. If you buy one today, it will stop working properly when carriers eventually switch to pure SA networks.

The Choice: Always choose a "Dual-Mode" 5G Gateway. It connects to NSA networks now and seamlessly switches to SA networks when they become available.

NSA vs. SA: Choosing the Right 5G Gateway Architecture

Not all "5G" is created equal.

You might have a 5G signal on your phone, but notice that the latency (ping) is still around 30ms—similar to 4G. Why?

The answer lies in the network architecture.

Carriers are rolling out 5G in two distinct stages: NSA (Non-Standalone) and SA (Standalone).3

For enterprise buyers, understanding this distinction is vital. If you buy the wrong hardware, your expensive 5G Gateway might become a paperweight in three years.


A technical diagram comparing Non-Standalone (NSA) architecture relying on a 4G core versus Standalone (SA) architecture using a pure 5G core.


1. What is NSA? (The Hybrid)

NSA stands for Non-Standalone.4

It is the "Fast Track" to 5G deployment. Most global 5G networks launched between 2019 and 2024 are NSA.

How it works:

  • The Radio (Speed): The gateway talks to a 5G tower to get high download speeds.
  • The Core (Brain): The control signals (connecting, authenticating, handover) are handled by the existing 4G LTE Core network (EPC).
  • The Anchor: The gateway must connect to a 4G LTE tower first (the "Anchor") before it can add the 5G connection.

Pros:

  • Deploy Now: It allows carriers to offer 5G speeds without rebuilding their entire core network.
  • High Bandwidth: Excellent for downloading large files (eMBB).

Cons:

  • 4G Latency: Because the "Brain" is still 4G, you are stuck with 4G latency limitations (30-50ms).
  • No Slicing: You cannot use advanced features like Network Slicing.

2. What is SA? (The Purebred)

SA stands for Standalone.

This is the "End Goal" of 5G. It is currently being rolled out by forward-thinking carriers (like T-Mobile in the US, or carriers in China/Singapore).5

How it works:

  • The Radio: 5G Tower.
  • The Core:5G Core (5GC).6 Cloud-native, virtualized infrastructure.
  • Independence: No 4G LTE anchor is needed.

Pros:

  • Ultra-Low Latency: Unlocks URLLC (<10ms latency) for robotics and autonomous vehicles.
  • Network Slicing: Enables dedicated, guaranteed bandwidth slices for critical apps.
  • Massive IoT: More efficient for connecting millions of small sensors.

Cons:

  • Coverage: It takes longer for carriers to build out full SA coverage.

A visual analogy comparing NSA 5G to an old car with a new engine, and SA 5G to a completely new high-performance vehicle.


3. The Car Analogy

Think of 5G deployment like building a high-performance car.

  • 4G LTE is a standard gas sedan.
  • NSA (Non-Standalone) is like putting a Ferrari Engine (5G Radio) into that Old Sedan Chassis(4G Core).
    • Result: It goes much faster (Speed), but it still steers and handles like an old car (Latency). It still needs the old chassis to hold it together.
  • SA (Standalone) is a brand new Electric Supercarbuilt from the ground up.
    • Result: It has the new engine and a new chassis. It is fast, corners instantly (Low Latency), and has features the old car couldn't dream of (Autonomous Driving).

4. Why Hardware Selection Matters

In 2019, the first wave of 5G routers hit the market. Many were NSA Only.

If you deploy an NSA-only device today, you face a risk:

As carriers migrate spectrum from 4G to 5G SA, the "4G Anchor" signal might disappear or weaken. Your device will lose connectivity.

The Golden Rule:

When buying an Industrial 5G Gateway, check the spec sheet for "NSA/SA Dual Mode."

This ensures your device is a chameleon:

  • Today: It uses NSA to give you high speeds on current networks.
  • Tomorrow: When the carrier flips the switch to SA, your gateway automatically updates and connects to the new core, unlocking lower latency without you needing to buy new hardware.

A conceptual illustration showing how Standalone (SA) architecture unlocks advanced 5G capabilities like network slicing and ultra-low latency.


5. Comparison: Which one do you need?

Feature

NSA (Non-Standalone)

SA (Standalone)

Primary Focus

Speed (eMBB)

Latency (URLLC) & IoT

Core Network

4G (EPC)

5G (5GC)

Dependency

Needs 4G Signal (Anchor)

Independent

Latency

Medium (30-50ms)

Low (<10ms)

Network Slicing

No

Yes

Best Use Case

Web Browsing, Video Streaming

Robotics, AGVs, Smart Grid

Conclusion: Future-Proof Your Network

The debate isn't really "NSA vs. SA"—it is "Now vs. Future."

NSA is the reality of today's coverage. SA is the requirement for tomorrow's applications.

By selecting a robust 5G Gateway that supports both architectures, you bridge the gap. You get the bandwidth you need immediately, with the assurance that your infrastructure is ready for the real-time revolution of the Standalone era.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q1: How do I know if I am connected to NSA or SA?

A1: Most industrial 5G gateways have a "Status" page in their web interface. Look for "Network Type" or "5G State." It will explicitly say "5G NSA" (often showing an LTE band + 5G band, e.g., B2 + n71) or "5G SA" (showing only a 5G band, e.g., n71).

Q2: Does SA provide faster download speeds than NSA?

A2: Surprisingly, not always. Because NSA combines 4G and 5G bandwidth (Dual Connectivity), it can sometimes offer higher peak download speeds today. However, SA offers much faster upload speeds and significantly better latency.

Q3: Will 4G gateways work on 5G SA networks?

A3: No. A 4G device cannot talk to a 5G Core. It will stay on the 4G LTE network. As long as the carrier maintains the 4G network (which they will for years), the device will work, but it will never get 5G benefits.