Choosing a Robustel IoT Gateway: EG5120 vs. EG5100 Head-to-Head
|
|
Time to read 7 min
|
|
Time to read 7 min
So, you've decided on a Robustel IoT Gateway. Excellent choice. Now you're at the final step: do you need the EG5100 "Workhorse" or the EG5120 "Powerhouse"? This guide breaks down the EG5120 vs EG5100 decision. In short: The EG5100 is the cost-effective, reliable choice for standard PLC data collection and simple protocol translation (e.g., Modbus to MQTT). The EG5120 is the superior edge computing gateway, built with a powerful Quad-Core CPU and an NPU for Edge AI, designed to run multiple complex Docker containers and future-proof your IoT Gateway deployment.
Shared Platform: Both gateways run RobustOS Pro (Debian 11) and support Docker, offering a familiar, open developer environment. Both are fully managed by RCMS.
EG5100 (The Workhorse): Features a Single-Core ARM A7 CPU, 512MB RAM, and 8GB eMMC. It's the perfect, cost-effective IoT Gateway for data acquisition and running one or two lightweight Docker containers.
EG5120 (The Powerhouse): A massive upgrade. Features a Quad-Core ARM A53 CPU, 2GB DDR4 RAM, 16GB eMMC, and a dedicated 2.3 TOPS NPU (AI Accelerator). This is the IoT Gateway for serious on-device data processing, Edge AI, and running multiple, heavy Docker applications.
The Choice: The EG5120 vs EG5100 decision is simple: if your project involves Edge AI, complex analytics, or running multiple apps, choose the EG5120. For reliable data collection and simple logic, the EG5100 is your rock-solid IoT Gateway.
You've done the hard part. You've sifted through the market, you've dodged the "Raspberry Pi trap," and you've decided you need a professional, industrial IoT gateway. You've landed on Robustel. Good.
Now you face the final choice: the EG5100 or the EG5120?
They look similar. They're both managed by RCMS. They both run our open OS. But underneath the hood, they are two very different beasts, built for two very different jobs. I've seen engineers over-spec and waste money, and I've seen them under-spec and hit a performance wall. This guide will make sure you don't do either. This is the official EG5120 vs EG5100 breakdown.
First, let's get this out of the way. No matter which one you choose, you're getting a professional IoT Gateway platform. Both the EG5100 and EG5120 share the same core "DNA":
apt install, and a familiar Linux environment.You can't make a "bad" choice. But you can make an inefficient one. Let's look at the differences.

The spec sheet is where the different design philosophies become clear. This isn't just a minor refresh; it's a "pickup truck vs. a monster truck" comparison for your IoT Gateway needs.
This is the single biggest performance difference.
What this actually means: The EG5120 isn't just "a little faster"; it's in a different league. The EG5100 is a fantastic IoT Gateway for PLC data collection—it can comfortably run a Python script or a single Docker container (like Node-RED) to handle your Modbus-to-MQTT translation.
The EG5120 is a true edge computing gateway. It can run multiple, heavy Docker containers at the same time. Want to run Node-RED, plus a local InfluxDB database, plus a Grafana dashboard and your custom analytics app? The EG5120 won't even break a sweat. The EG5100 would choke.
If your IoT Gateway is just a bridge, the EG5100 is fine. If your IoT Gateway is a server, you need the EG5120.
This is the second, critical difference.
What this actually means: An NPU is an "AI accelerator." It's hardware built for one job: running machine learning models extremely fast.
If your project involves Edge AI—like predictive maintenance (analyzing vibration data), machine vision (checking for defects), or acoustic analysis (listening for faults)—the EG5120 is your only choice. It can run a complex AI model in milliseconds, whereas the EG5100 (running it on its single CPU) would take many seconds, or simply fail.
If you have any plans for AI in the next 3 years, choosing the EG5120 is the ultimate future-proofing for your IoT Gateway fleet.
This is a simpler, but important, distinction.
What this actually means: For most IoT Gateway tasks (like sending small MQTT packets from a PLC), 100 Mbps is more than enough. But if your IoT Gateway will be on a high-speed corporate network, or if it's aggregating data from many other devices (like IP cameras or high-speed data loggers), the Gigabit ports on the EG5120 prevent the network from being your bottleneck.

Here's the TCO "gut check" I give our customers: The EG5100 is a fantastic, cost-effective IoT Gateway. But the price difference between the EG5100 and the EG5120 is tiny compared to the cost of replacing 500 gateways in three years because your application outgrew them.
If you are 100% certain your project is, and always will be, simple data collection, the EG5100 is the smart, economical choice.
For everything else? The EG5120 is the answer. It's the industrial raspberry pi alternative that's actually industrial. It gives you the "headroom" to grow, to experiment with AI, and to run complex applications. Don't let a small, upfront budget saving today create a massive performance bottleneck for your IoT Gateway fleet tomorrow.

A1: Yes, absolutely. Both gateways run RobustOS Pro, which includes native Docker support. The key difference is performance. The EG5100 is great for a single, lightweight container. The EG5120 is designed to run multiple, complex containers thanks to its Quad-Core CPU and 2GB of RAM.
A2: Yes, probably. If your only task is simple Modbus to MQTT translation, the EG5100 is the more cost-effective IoT Gateway for that job. But I always ask, "Are you sure that's all you'll ever want to do with that data?"
A3: No, the RCMS experience is identical. Both gateways are managed from the same platform, with the same powerful features for remote access (RobustVPN), Docker management, and OTA updates. The platform treats them as a unified fleet; the only difference is the hardware capability on the device itself.